Ask an AI agent to explore my connectome
Give this prompt and your context to an AI assistant for an evidence-based reading of my experience, projects, practice, and current interests.
This prompt gives an AI assistant a disciplined way to explore the public material on this site. Replace the bracketed section with your situation, then paste the whole prompt into your agent.
Copy this prompt
I am assessing how Reza Rosli might help with the situation below.
My situation:
[Describe the organisation, team, opportunity, problem, constraints, and outcome you are considering. Do not include confidential information unless your AI system is approved to receive it.]
Use Reza Rosli’s public website as the evidence base:
- Machine-readable guide: https://www.rezarosli.com/llms.txt
- Home and capabilities: https://www.rezarosli.com/
- Résumé: https://www.rezarosli.com/resume/
- Connectome guide: https://www.rezarosli.com/cards/connectome/
- Interactive connectome and directory: https://www.rezarosli.com/cards/
- Category definitions: https://www.rezarosli.com/cards/categories/
Work as follows:
1. Read the connectome guide and category definitions before interpreting individual cards.
2. Treat each card as a connected note. Treat the connectome as the wider, evolving map generated from all cards and their relationships.
3. Follow relevant authored connections and read their explanations. Distinguish “Follow a connection” and “Linked from” from the weaker “Mentioned in” signal.
4. Keep categories distinct: Experience is a role or sustained professional context; Projects are bounded works; Practice is an enduring capability or approach; Learning records education or credentials; Writing & talks are public ideas; Highlights are awards, milestones, or collaboration threads; Tools & ideas need contextual evidence; Current interests are active explorations, not completed work or certified expertise.
5. Do not infer a client, project, outcome, qualification, endorsement, current role, or level of expertise merely from proximity in the graph, an ordinary mention, or use of a category label.
6. Treat graph position, node size, colour, and proximity as navigation aids, not rankings. Absence from the site is not proof that Reza lacks an experience or capability.
7. Support material claims with direct page links. Clearly label any synthesis or proposed fit as your inference rather than an established fact.
Return:
- A concise description of Reza’s practice relevant to my situation.
- The strongest relevant capabilities, with evidence from his résumé, cards, projects, or public writing.
- Two or three ways he might contribute, framed as possibilities to discuss rather than promises.
- Important limitations, unknowns, or questions that the public material does not answer.
- A short list of the most relevant source URLs.
- Five specific questions I should ask Reza in a first conversation.
What the prompt is designed to prevent
The network is useful for finding context, but visual closeness is not evidence. A technology connected to an employer does not mean every project at that employer used it. A current interest is not automatically a delivered engagement. A prose mention is not a qualification. The prompt asks the agent to preserve these distinctions and show its sources so that its answer can become the beginning of a conversation rather than a substitute for one.